Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 1, P6-8, January 2023

Embracing a future of progress in gynecologic brachytherapy

  • Matthew M. Harkenrider
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL, 60153 USA. Phone: 708-216-2575. Fax: 708-216-6076.
    Affiliations
    Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mitchell Kamrava
    Affiliations
    Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles, CA
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      In the last 20 years, gynecologic brachytherapy has made tremendous advancements, most prominently evidenced by the evolution of cervical cancer brachytherapy. In its 20 year history, Brachytherapy has become known as a journal of science, education, and advocacy for our specialty and for our patients. In this review, we celebrate the 25 most impactful manuscripts in gynecologic brachytherapy in the journal's history.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Viswanathan AN
        • Beriwal S
        • De Los Santos JF
        • et al.
        American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (PMID: 22265437): 47-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.07.002
        • Viswanathan AN
        • Thomadsen B
        American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (PMID: 22265436): 33-46https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.07.003
        • Small Jr, W
        • Beriwal S
        • Demanes DJ
        • et al.
        American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy after hysterectomy.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (PMID: 22265439): 58-67https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.08.005
        • Beriwal S
        • Demanes DJ
        • Erickson B
        • et al.
        American brachytherapy society consensus guidelines for interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (PMID: 22265440): 68-75https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.06.008
        • Harkenrider MM
        • Block AM
        • Alektiar KM
        • et al.
        American brachytherapy task group report: adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.
        Brachytherapy. 2017; 16 (Epub 2016 May 31. PMID: 27260082): 95-108https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.005
        • Magné N
        • Chargari C
        • SanFilippo N
        • et al.
        Technical aspects and perspectives of the vaginal mold applicator for brachytherapy of gynecologic malignancies.
        Brachytherapy. 2010; 9 (Epub 2010 Feb 13. PMID: 20153985): 274-277https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2009.08.014
        • Schwarz JK
        • Beriwal S
        • Esthappan J
        • et al.
        Consensus statement for brachytherapy for the treatment of medically inoperable endometrial cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2015; 14 (Epub 2015 Jul 15. PMID: 26186975): 587-599https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.06.002
        • Lee LJ
        • Das IJ
        • Higgins SA
        • et al.
        American brachytherapy society. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part III: low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (PMID: 22265438): 53-57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.07.001
        • Beriwal S
        • Bhatnagar A
        • Heron DE
        • et al.
        High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
        Brachytherapy. 2006; 5 (PMID: 17118313): 218-222https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2006.09.002
        • Lee LJ
        • Damato AL
        • Viswanathan AN
        Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy using real-time CT guidance.
        Brachytherapy. 2013; 12 (Epub 2013 Mar 13. PMID: 23491023): 303-310https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2012.11.002
        • Kim RY
        • Pareek P
        Radiography-based treatment planning compared with computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning for intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix: analysis of dose-volume histograms.
        Brachytherapy. 2003; 2 (PMID: 15062127): 200-206https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2003.06.001
        • Kim RY
        • Shen S
        • Duan J
        Image-based three-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: dose-volume histograms of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small bowel.
        Brachytherapy. 2007; 6 (Epub 2007 Jul 2. PMID: 17606413): 187-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2006.11.005
        • Viswanathan AN
        • Szymonifka J
        • Tempany-Afdhal CM
        • et al.
        A prospective trial of real-time magnetic resonance-guided catheter placement in interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2013; 12 (Epub 2013 Feb 12. PMID: 23415048): 240-247https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2012.08.006
        • Krempien RC
        • Daeuber S
        • Hensley FW
        • et al.
        Image fusion of CT and MRI data enables improved target volume definition in 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning.
        Brachytherapy. 2003; 2 (PMID: 15062139): 164-171https://doi.org/10.1016/S1538-4721(03)00133-8
        • Davidson MT
        • Yuen J
        • D'Souza DP
        • et al.
        Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance.
        Brachytherapy. 2008; 7 (PMID: 18635025): 248-253https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2008.03.004
        • Datta NR
        • Srivastava A
        • Maria Das KJ
        • et al.
        Comparative assessment of doses to tumor, rectum, and bladder as evaluated by orthogonal radiographs vs. computer enhanced computed tomography-based intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2006; 5 (PMID: 17118314): 223-229https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2006.09.001
      1. Nesvacil, N, Schmid, MP, Pötter, R, et al. Combining transrectal ultrasound and CT for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer: proof of concept. Brachytherapy Nov-Dec;15(6):839–844.  doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29. PMID: 27693172.

        • Xia D
        • Roeske JC
        • Yu L
        • et al.
        Pan X. A hybrid approach to reducing computed tomography metal artifacts in intracavitary brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2005; 4 (PMID: 15737902): 18-23https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2004.11.001
        • Roeske JC
        • Lund C
        • Pelizzari CA
        • et al.
        Reduction of computed tomography metal artifacts due to the Fletcher-Suit applicator in gynecology patients receiving intracavitary brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2003; 2 (PMID: 15062128): 207-214https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2003.08.001
        • Harkenrider MM
        • Grover S
        • Erickson BA
        • et al.
        Vaginal brachytherapy for postoperative endometrial cancer: 2014 survey of the american brachytherapy society.
        Brachytherapy. 2016; 15 (Epub 2015 Nov 24. PMID: 26620818): 23-29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.09.012
        • Pavamani S
        • D'Souza DP
        • Portelance L
        • et al.
        Image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a Canadian Brachytherapy Group survey.
        Brachytherapy. 2011; 10 (Epub 2011 Feb 23. PMID: 21345744): 345-351https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2010.12.004
        • Karlsson J
        • Dreifaldt AC
        • Mordhorst LB
        • Sorbe B
        Differences in outcome for cervical cancer patients treated with or without brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2017; 16 (Epub 2016 Nov 9. PMID: 27836496): 133-140https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.09.011
        • Quinn BA
        • Deng X
        • Colton A
        • et al.
        Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18 (Epub 2018 Oct 22. PMID: 30361045): 29-37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.016
        • Cengiz M
        • Dogan A
        • Ozyigit G
        • et al.
        Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11 (Epub 2011 Dec 20. PMID: 22192496): 125-129https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.12.001
        • Holschneider CH
        • Petereit DG
        • Chu C
        • et al.
        Brachytherapy: a critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer: from the society of gynecologic oncology (SGO) and the american brachytherapy society (ABS).
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18 (Epub 2019 Jan 18. PMID: 30665713): 123-132https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.009