Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 21, ISSUE 6, P754-763, November 2022

Feasibility of using polytetrafluoroethylene flexible implant tube for interstitial brachytherapy patients

Published:September 07, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2022.07.007

      ABSTRACT

      PURPOSE

      To design the different Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) based flexible implant tubes using an in-house developed device and to evaluate them for High dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy using computer tomography images.

      METHODS AND MATERIALS

      PTFE hollow tube having a 2 mm (6 French) outer diameter (OD) and 1.4 mm inner diameter (ID) was used to design in-house single and/or double leader flexible catheters for interstitial brachytherapy implant. An in-house Plastic Wire Drawing Plate (PWDP) machine was developed. Customization of PTFE hollow flexible implant tube (FIT) was done through PWDP. Different percentages of BaSO4 (5%, 10%, & 15%) were added to Nylon 6 to make radiopaque button. Various quality assurance tests were performed with the PTFE tubes implanted in the brinjal (phantom) before using them on the patients. That is, coupling of brachytherapy machine transfer tube with flexible PTFE Tubes, CT scan artifacts, tube kinks, breast template, and free-hand compatibility.

      RESULTS

      With the help of the PWDP machine, plastic wires of different lengths were made for single leader and double leader tubes. The different plastic leader ends of 1 cm to 50 cm lengths having 1 mm diameter were created. The radiopaque button of Nylon 6 in circular shape having 1 cm diameter and 0.5 cm thick was created. Developed radiopaque buttons were visible on CT scan images as well as on radiograph images.

      CONCLUSIONS

      PTFE tubes of the desired length can be made depending upon the size of the brachytherapy implant and are inexpensive than commercially available flexible implant tubes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Strnad V.
        • Major T.
        • Polgar C.
        • et al.
        ESTRO-ACROP guideline: interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation alone or as boost – GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations.
        Radiother Oncol. 2018; 128: 411-420https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.009
        • Guinot J.L.
        • Rembielak A.
        • Perez-Calatayud J.
        • et al.
        GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations in skin brachytherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2018; 126: 377-385https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.013
        • Kovács G.
        • Martinez-Monge R.
        • Budrukkar A.
        • et al.
        GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head and neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update – Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology.
        Radiother Oncol. 2017; 122: 248-254https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.008
        • Gurram L.
        • Wadasadawala T.
        • Joshi K.
        • et al.
        Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement.
        J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016; 8: 116-121https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59195
        • Ouhib Z.
        • Kasper M.
        • Perez Calatayud J.
        • et al.
        Aspects of dosimetry and clinical practice of skin brachytherapy: the American Brachytherapy Society working group report.
        Brachytherapy. 2015; 14: 840-858https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.06.005
        • Guix B.
        • Finestres F.
        • Tello J.I.
        • et al.
        Treatment of skin carcinomas of the face by high-dose-rate brachytherapy and custom-made surface molds.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47: 95-102https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00547-7
        • Campos Magalhães Garcia L.S.
        • Garcia Trigo M.L
        Results of accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients not suitable for external beam irradiation stratified by GEC-ESTRO, ASTRO, and ABS guidelines.
        Brachytherapy. 2021; 20: 315-325https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.10.005
        • Gaudreault M.
        • Reniers B.
        • Landry G.
        • et al.
        Dose perturbation due to catheter materials in high-dose-rate interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2014; 13: 627-631https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.010
        • Mira J.G.
        • Gates G.A.
        • Whiteley A.B.
        Technique modification for radioactive implants when plastic tubes are used in fibrosed head and neck areas.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 1982; 8: 1799-1801https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(82)90305-4
        • Colthart R.S.
        • Newman H.F.V.
        • Watson J.V.
        New methods for implanting plastic tubes for 192iridium brachytherapy using steel needles.
        Clin Radiol. 1987; 38: 275-276https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(87)80066-1
        • Henry B.J.
        • Carlin J.P.
        • Hammerschmidt J.A.
        • et al.
        A critical review of the application of polymer of low concern and regulatory criteria to fluoropolymers.
        Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018; 14: 316-334https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4035
        • Hafad S.A.
        • Hamood A.F.
        • Alsalihi H.A.
        • et al.
        Mechanical properties study of polycarbonate and other thermoplastic polymers.
        J Phys Conf Ser. 2021; : 1973https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1973/1/012001
        • Kameda T.
        • Ohkuma K.
        • Oka S.
        Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE): a resin material for possible use in dental prostheses and devices.
        Dent Mater J. 2019; 38: 136-142https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-088
        • Silva J.T.
        • Daruich de Souza C.
        • Angelocci L.V.
        • et al.
        New model for an epoxy-based brachytherapy source to be used in spinal cancer treatment.
        Appl Radiat Isot. 2021; 178109952https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109952
        • Lundquist P.B.
        • Kalin B.
        • Olofsson P.
        • Swedenborg J.
        Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic lower limb lesions using a PTFE-collared stent-graft.
        J Endovasc Ther. 2000; 7: 221-226https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2000)007<0221:ETOALL>2.3.CO;2
        • Gupta V.
        • Mathur J.
        Gupta-Mathur tube tapering device for interstitial brachytherapy using 192Ir wire.
        J Med Phys. 1993; 19: 91-92
        • Fonseca G.P.
        • Van Den Bosch M.R.
        • Voncken R.
        • et al.
        A novel system for commissioning brachytherapy applicators: example of a ring applicator.
        Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62: 8360-8375https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa8d0a
      1. Dempsey C., Smith R., Nyathi T., et al. ACPSEM brachytherapy working group recommendations for quality assurance in brachytherapy. 2013:387–396. doi: 10.1007/s13246-013-0228-7.

        • Narayana A.
        • Cohen G.N.
        • Zaider M.
        • et al.
        High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in recurrent and previously irradiated head and neck cancers—Preliminary results.
        Brachytherapy. 2007; 6: 157-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2006.12.001
        • Choi S.Y.
        • Hur W.
        • Kim B.K.
        • et al.
        Bioabsorbable bone fixation plates for X-ray imaging diagnosis by a radiopaque layer of barium sulfate and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid).
        J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2015; 103: 596-607https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33235