Advertisement

Brachytherapy workflow for locally advanced cervical cancer: A survey of Canadian Medical Physicists

      ABSTRACT

      PURPOSE

      To report on brachytherapy (BT) workflows for image-based treatments of locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) in Canada.

      METHODS

      Medical Physicists in every Canadian cancer center were contacted and those with a CC-BT program were emailed a 44-item electronic questionnaire surveying workflow patterns including: fractionation schedules, prescription, equipment, imaging, and treatment delivery.

      RESULTS

      Of 47 centers contacted, all 34 who performed CC-BT participated in the survey. Brachytherapy boost, following external beam treatments, was delivered using high-dose-rate (HDR); one center also used pulsed-dose-rate. Intracavitary and/or interstitial treatments were done in 47% centers for 25–80% of their patients. All centers used image-based planning: CT (32%), CT planned with MRI for contouring (47%), MRI (18%), or cone beam CT (3%). For those performing volume-based planning (74%), the contours commonly included Clinical Target Volume (CTV)-High Risk (HR), CTV-Intermediate Risk, rectum, sigmoid, and bladder. The most common HDR dose-fractionation schedule was 7 [4.6 – 10] Gy in 4 [3 – 6] fractions with radiobiological dose prescriptions performed in 62% centers. Medical physics contribution was significant during most activities along the BT treatment pathway in all centers, especially in planning (88%), second checks (68%), and during treatment delivery (88%).

      CONCLUSIONS

      Compared to previous surveys, there is an increasing trend in the use of image-based volumetric planning, interstitial procedures, and radiobiological dose prescription. Cervical cancer brachytherapy in Canada is becoming more streamlined with the use of international practice guidelines. Involvement of medical physicists is vital to all stages of CC-BT, including program implementation, routine quality control, dosimetry, and treatment delivery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Arbyn M.
        • Weiderpass E.
        • Bruni L.
        • et al.
        Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.
        Lancet Global Health. 2020; 8: 191-203
      1. American Cancer Society: Key Statistics for Cervical Cancer. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html. Accessed December 10, 2021.

      2. Canadian Cancer Society: Cervical cancer statistics. Available at: https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/cervical/statistics. Accessed December 10, 2021.

        • Eifel P.J.
        • Winter K.
        • Morris M.
        • et al.
        Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.
        J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 872-880
        • Pötter R.
        • Tanderup K.
        • Kirisits C.
        • et al.
        The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies.
        Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2018; 9: 48-60
        • Chow B.
        • Warkentin B.
        • Menon G.
        Radiobiological dose calculation parameters for cervix cancer brachytherapy: a systematic review.
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18: 546-558
        • Pötter R.
        • Tanderup K.
        • Schmid M.P.
        • et al.
        EMBRACE Collaborative Group. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22: 538-547
      3. https://www.cancercareontario.ca/sites/ccocancercare/files/assets/CervicalCancerTreatmentPathwayMap_2020-01.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2022.

      4. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Brachytherapy for Cancer of the Cervix.
        J ICRU. 2013; 3 (PMID: 27335496)https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndw027
        • Phan T.
        • Mula-Hussain L.
        • Pavamani S.
        • et al.
        The changing landscape of brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a Canadian practice survey.
        Current Oncology. 2015; 22: 356-360
        • Pearce A.
        • Craighead P.
        • Kay I.
        • et al.
        Brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: a Canadian survey of practice patterns in a changing era.
        Radiother Oncol. 2009; 91: 194-196
        • Taggar A.
        • Phan T.
        • Traptow L.
        • et al.
        Cervical cancer brachytherapy in Canada: a focus on interstitial brachytherapy utilization.
        Brachytherapy. 2017; 16: 161-166
        • Marchant K.J.
        • Sadikov E.
        The evolving practice of intrauterine cervix brachytherapy in Canada: a medical physics perspective.
        Brachytherapy. 2013; 12: 324-330
      5. Canadian Cancer Centres. Available at: https://comp-ocpm.ca/english/career-education/career-resources/canadian-cancer-centres.html. Accessed October 27, 2021.

      6. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology. Available at: http://www.caro-acro.ca/. Accessed October 27, 2021.

        • Hagen B.
        • O'Beirne M.
        • Desai S.
        • et al.
        Innovations in the ethical review of health-related quality improvement and Research: the Alberta Research Ethics community consensus initiative (ARECCI).
        Health Policy (New York). 2007; 2: 164-177
      7. Population Centre and Rural Area Classification 2016 https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects/standard/pcrac/2016/introduction#s3. Accessed February 20, 2022.

      8. EMBRACE II study protocol. Available at: https://www.embracestudy.dk/Public/Default.aspx?main=2&sub=16&embrace=embrace2. Accessed October 27, 2021.

        • Viswanathan A.
        • Beriwal S.
        • De Los
        • Santos J.
        • et al.
        American Brachytherapy Society. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11: 47-52
        • Mayadev J.
        • Benedict S.
        • Kamrava M.
        Handbook of Image-Guided Brachytherapy.
        Springer International Publishing, 2017
        • Serban M.
        • Kirisits C.
        • de Leeuw A.
        • et al.
        Ring versus Ovoids and Intracavitary versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: results from the EMBRACE I Study.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 106: 1052-1062
        • Kirisits C.
        • Lang S.
        • Dimopoulos J.
        • et al.
        The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65: 624-630
        • Dimopoulos J.
        • Kirisits C.
        • Petric P.
        • et al.
        The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66: 83-90
        • Singer L.
        • McLaughlin P.Y.
        • Alban G.
        • et al.
        Simulation-based graduate medical education in MR-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2020; 19: 725-731
        • Roumeliotis M.
        • Quirk S.
        • Husain S.
        • et al.
        Establishing a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy: building validation evidence.
        Brachytherapy. 2020; 19: 812-819
        • Taunk N.
        • Shah N.
        • Hubley E.
        • et al.
        Virtual reality-based simulation improves gynecologic brachytherapy proficiency, engagement, and trainee self-confidence.
        Brachytherapy. 2021; 20: 695-700
        • Davidson T.M.
        • Yuen J.
        • D'Souza D.
        • et al.
        Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance.
        Brachytherapy. 2008; 7: 248-253
        • Ning M.S.
        • Venkatesan A.
        • Stafford J.
        • et al.
        Developing an intraoperative 3T MRI-guided brachytherapy program within a diagnostic imaging suite: methods, process workflow, and value-based analysis.
        Brachytherapy. 2020; 19: 427-437
        • Jaffray D.A.
        • Carlone M.C.
        • Milosevic M.F.
        • et al.
        A facility for magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014; 24: 193-195
        • Trifiletti D.M.
        • Libby B.
        • Feuerlein S.
        • et al.
        Implementing MRI-based target delineation for cervical cancer treatment within a rapid workflow environment for image-guided brachytherapy: a practical approach for centers without in-room MRI.
        Brachytherapy. 2015; 14: 905-909
        • Dimopoulos J.C.
        • Petrow P.
        • Tanderup K.
        • et al.
        Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103: 113-122
        • Mahantshetty U.
        • Poetter R.
        • Beriwal S.
        • et al.
        IBS-GEC ESTRO-ABS recommendations for CT based contouring in image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2021; 160: 273-284
        • Hellebust T.P.
        • Kirisits C.
        • Berger D.
        • et al.
        Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group: considerations and pitfalls in commissioning and applicator reconstruction in 3D image-based treatment planning of cervix cancer brachytherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2010; 96: 153-160
        • Lim K.
        • van Dyk S.
        • Khaw P.
        • et al.
        Patterns of practice survey for brachytherapy for cervix cancer in Australia and New Zealand.
        J of Med Imaging and Rad Onc. 2017; 61: 674-681
        • Toita T.
        • Ohno T.
        • Ikushima H.
        • et al.
        National survey of intracavitary brachytherapy for intact uterine cervical cancer in Japan.
        J of Radiation Research. 2018; 59: 469-476
        • Chatterjee A.
        • Grover S.
        • Gurram L.
        • et al.
        Patterns of cervical cancer brachytherapy in India: results of an online survey supported by the Indian Brachytherapy Society.
        J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2019; 11: 527-533