Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 14, ISSUE 3, P329-333, May 2015

Refining prostate seed brachytherapy: Comparing high-, intermediate-, and low-activity seeds for I-125 permanent seed prostate brachytherapy

  • Guila Delouya
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada

    CRCHUM-Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Pascal Bahary
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jean-François Carrier
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Renée-Xavière Larouche
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yannick Hervieux
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dominic Béliveau-Nadeau
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • David Donath
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Daniel Taussky
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke St. E. Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2L 4M1. Tel.: +1-514-890-8254; fax: +1-514-412-7537.
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada

    CRCHUM-Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universiténde Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 24, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.11.011

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To analyze the difference in prostate coverage and dose to the rectum in men with prostate carcinoma treated with permanent seed brachytherapy with different seed activities.

      Methods

      Forty-nine patients treated with iodine-125 permanent seed prostate brachytherapy with low-activity seeds of 0.30–0.37 mCi were identified. For each of these patients, 2 patients with similar prostate volume (±2 cc) were paired: one treated with intermediate seed activity (0.44–0.46 mCi) and one with high seed activity (0.60–0.66 mCi). The doses to prostate and rectum were compared using CT on Day 30.

      Results

      A total of 147 patients divided into the three seed activity groups were analyzed. Mean prostate volume was 35.7 cc (standard deviation [SD], 11.70). Compared with low-activity seeds, implants with high-activity seeds consisted of an average of 22 seeds and 4.7 needles less. The dose to the prostate (prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose [V100], prostate volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose, and minimal dose covering 90% of the prostate volume expressed in Gy) was not higher on Day 30 (p = 0.58–0.97). The mean volume (in cubic centimeters) of rectal wall receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) increased with activity: low activity, 0.34 cc (SD, 0.49), intermediate activity, 0.47 cc (SD, 0.48), and high activity, 0.72 cc (SD, 0.79) (p = 0.009). There was a trend (p = 0.073) toward a higher frequency of clinically unfavorable rectal dosimetry (V100 > 1.3 cc) in patients with high-activity seeds (16.7%) compared with low-activity (6.3%) or intermediate-activity (4.2%) seeds.

      Conclusion

      High-activity seeds do not result in a higher dose to the prostate but in a higher dose to the rectum.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Masucci G.L.
        • Donath D.
        • Tétreault-Laflamme A.
        • et al.
        Comparison between high and low source activity seeds for I-125 permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78: 781-786
        • Narayana V.
        • Troyer S.
        • Evans V.
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of high- and low-source strength (125)I prostate seed implants.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61: 44-51
        • Zelefsky M.J.
        • Kuban D.A.
        • Levy L.B.
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67: 327-333
        • Tétreault-Laflamme A.
        • Zilli T.
        • Meissner A.
        • et al.
        The Quadrella: A novel approach to analyzing optimal outcomes after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; 111: 110-113
        • Aronowitz J.N.
        • Crook J.M.
        • Michalski J.M.
        • et al.
        Inter-institutional variation of implant activity for permanent prostate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2008; 7: 297-300
        • Martin A.G.
        • Roy J.
        • Beaulieu L.
        • et al.
        Permanent prostate implant using high activity seeds and inverse planning with fast simulated annealing algorithm: A 12-year Canadian experience.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67: 334-341
        • Davis B.J.
        • Horwitz E.M.
        • Lee W.R.
        • et al.
        • American Brachytherapy Society
        American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for transrectal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11: 6-19
        • Battermann J.J.
        • Boon T.A.
        • Moerland M.A.
        • et al.
        Results of permanent prostate brachytherapy, 13 years of experience at a single institution.
        Radiother Oncol. 2004; 71: 23-28
        • Herbert C.
        • Morris W.J.
        • Keyes M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes following iodine-125 brachytherapy in patients with Gleason 7, intermediate risk prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103: 228-232
        • Crook J.
        • Borg J.
        • Evans A.
        • et al.
        10-year experience with I-125 prostate brachytherapy at the Princess Margaret Hospital: Results for 1,100 patients.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80: 1323-1329
        • Potters L.
        • Cao Y.
        • Calugaru E.
        • et al.
        A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 50: 605-614
        • Snyder K.M.
        • Stock R.G.
        • Hong S.M.
        • et al.
        Defining the risk of developing grade 2 proctitis following 125I prostate brachytherapy using a rectal dose-volume histogram analysis.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 50: 335-341
        • Al-Qaisieh B.
        • Group UKPB
        Pre- and post-implant dosimetry: An inter-comparison between UK prostate brachytherapy centres.
        Radiother Oncol. 2003; 66: 181-183
        • Pinkawa M.
        • Asadpour B.
        • Piroth M.D.
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life after permanent I-125 brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer—A matched-pair comparison.
        Radiother Oncol. 2009; 91: 225-231
        • Guinot J.L.
        • Ricos J.V.
        • Gimeno J.
        • et al.
        Actas Urol Esp. 2011; 35 ([in Spanish]): 339-344
        • Merrick G.S.
        • Grimm P.D.
        • Sylvester J.
        • et al.
        Initial analysis of Pro-Qura: A multi-institutional database of prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
        Brachytherapy. 2007; 6: 9-15