Advertisement

MRI-based sector analysis enhances prostate palladium-103 brachytherapy quality assurance in a phase II prospective trial of men with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Palladium-103 (103Pd) may be superior to other isotopes in brachytherapy for localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer because of its relatively short half-life, higher initial dose rate, and greater dose heterogeneity within the target volume; these properties also underscore the need for accurate target delineation and postimplant quality assurance. We assessed the use of prostate sector analysis based on MRI for quality assurance after 103Pd monotherapy.

      Methods and Materials

      Fifty men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent 103Pd monotherapy in a prospective phase II trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dosimetric analyses on day 30 after the implant were done using both CT and fused CT/MRI scans. Dosimetric variables were assessed for the entire prostate and for each of three or six sectors. Volumes and dosimetric variables were compared with paired t tests.

      Results

      Postimplant dosimetric variables for the entire prostate were significantly different on CT vs. CT/MRI (p = 0.019 for V100 and p < 0.01 for D90). Prostate volumes were smaller on the CT/MRI scans (p < 0.00001). The base sector contributed the greatest difference, with doses based on CT/MRI lower than those based on CT (p < 0.01 for V100 and D90). To date, these lower base doses have not affected biochemical outcomes for patients with disease in prostate base biopsy samples.

      Conclusions

      CT/MRI is more precise than CT for prostate volume delineation and dosimetric quality assessment and thus provides superior heterogeneity control assessment after 103Pd monotherapy implants.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hurwitz M.D.
        • Halabi S.
        • Ou S.S.
        • et al.
        Combination external beam radiation and brachytherapy boost with androgen suppression for treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer: An initial report of CALGB 99809.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 814-819
        • Koontz B.F.
        • Chino J.
        • Lee W.R.
        • et al.
        Morbidity and prostate-specific antigen control of external beam radiation therapy plus low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2009; 8: 191-196
        • Khaksar S.J.
        • Langley S.E.
        • Lovell D.
        • et al.
        Interstitial low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer—A focus on intermediate- and high-risk disease.
        Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006; 18: 513-518
        • Zelefsky M.J.
        • Kuban D.A.
        • Levy L.B.
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67: 327-333
        • Frank S.J.
        • Grimm P.D.
        • Sylvester J.E.
        • et al.
        Interstitial implant alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A survey of practice patterns in the United States.
        Brachytherapy. 2007; 6: 2-8
        • Blasko J.C.
        • Grimm P.D.
        • Sylvester J.E.
        • et al.
        Palladium-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 46: 839-850
        • Merrick G.S.
        • Wallner K.E.
        • Butler W.M.
        • et al.
        20 Gy versus 44 Gy of supplemental external beam radiotherapy with palladium-103 for patients with greater risk disease: Results of a prospective randomized trial.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82: e449-e455
        • Stone N.N.
        • Cesaretti J.A.
        • Rosenstein B.
        • et al.
        Do high radiation doses in locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with 103Pd implant plus external beam irradiation cause increased urinary, rectal, and sexual morbidity?.
        Brachytherapy. 2010; 9: 114-118
        • Frank S.J.
        • Arterbery V.E.
        • Hsu I.C.J.
        • et al.
        American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2011; 10: 357-362
        • Milosevic M.
        • Voruganti S.
        • Blend R.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for localization of the prostatic apex: Comparison to computed tomography (CT) and urethrography.
        Radiother Oncol. 1998; 47: 277-284
        • Bice Jr., W.S.
        • Prestidge B.R.
        • Sarosdy M.F.
        Sector analysis of prostate implants.
        Med Phys. 2001; 28: 2561-2567
        • Brown A.P.
        • Pugh T.J.
        • Swanson D.A.
        • et al.
        Improving prostate brachytherapy quality assurance with MRI-based sector analysis in a phase II prospective trial.
        Brachytherapy. 2013; 12: 210-216
        • Ciezki J.P.
        • Reddy C.A.
        • Garcia J.
        • et al.
        PSA kinetics after prostate brachytherapy: PSA bounce phenomenon and its implications for PSA doubling time.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 64: 512-517
        • Caloglu M.
        • Ciezki J.P.
        • Reddy C.A.
        • et al.
        PSA bounce and biochemical failure after brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A study of 820 patients with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80: 735-741
        • Amdur R.J.
        • Gladstone D.
        • Leopold K.A.
        • et al.
        Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 43: 67-72
        • Chen L.
        • Price Jr., R.A.
        • Wang L.
        • et al.
        MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: Dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60: 636-647
        • Polo A.
        • Cattani F.
        • Vavassori A.
        • et al.
        MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60: 1572-1579
        • Samuelian J.M.
        • Swanson D.A.
        • Kudchadker R.J.
        • et al.
        Long-term tumor control after brachytherapy for base-of-prostate cancer.
        J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2011; 3: 183-187
        • Dattoli M.
        • Wallner K.
        • True L.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes after treatment with brachytherapy and supplemental conformal radiation for prostate cancer patients having intermediate and high-risk features.
        Cancer. 2007; 110: 551-555
        • Da Pozzo L.F.
        • Cozzarini C.
        • Briganti A.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: The positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy.
        Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 1003-1011