Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 12, ISSUE 3, P210-216, May 2013

An MRI-based dose–response analysis of urinary sphincter dose and urinary morbidity after brachytherapy for prostate cancer in a phase II prospective trial

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To compare dose–volume histogram variables for the internal and external urinary sphincters (IUS/EUS) with urinary quality of life after prostate brachytherapy.

      Methods and Materials

      Subjects were 42 consecutive men from a prospective study of brachytherapy as monotherapy with 125I for intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. No patient received hormonal therapy. Preplanning constraints included prostate V100 higher than 95%, V150 lower than 60%, and V200 lower than 20% and rectal R100 less than 1 cm3. Patients completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite quality-of-life questionnaire before and at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after implantation, and urinary domain scores were analyzed. All structures including the IUS and EUS were contoured on T2-weighted MRI at day 30, and doses received were calculated from identification of seeds on CT. Spearman's (nonparametric) rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was used for statistical analyses.

      Results

      Overall urinary morbidity was worst at 1 month after the implant. Urinary function declined when the IUS V285 was 0.4% (ρ=−0.32, p=0.04); bother worsened when the IUS V35 was 99% (ρ=−0.31, p=0.05) or the EUS V240 was 63% (ρ=−0.31, p=0.05); irritation increased when the IUS V35 was 95% (ρ=−0.37, p=0.02) and the EUS V265 was 24% (ρ=−0.32, p=0.04); and urgency worsened when the IUS V35 was 99.5% (ρ=−0.38, p=0.02). Incontinence did not correlate with EUS or IUS dose.

      Conclusions

      Doses to the IUS and EUS on MRI/CT predicted worse urinary function, with greater bother, irritative symptoms, and urgency. Incorporating MRI-based dose–volume histogram analysis into the treatment planning process may reduce acute urinary morbidity after brachytherapy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Brachytherapy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Cancer Society
        Cancer Facts & Figures 2013. American Cancer Society, Atlanta2013
        • Bill-Axelson A.
        • Holmberg L.
        • Filen F.
        • et al.
        Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: The Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomized trial.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 1144-1154
        • Wong Y.N.
        • Mitra N.
        • Hudes G.
        • et al.
        Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 2683-2693
        • D'Amico A.V.
        • Whittington R.
        • Malkowicz S.B.
        • et al.
        Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 969-974
        • Eade T.N.
        • Horwitz E.M.
        • Ruth K.
        • et al.
        A comparison of acute and chronic toxicity for men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or (125)I permanent implant.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71: 338-345
        • Kupelian P.A.
        • Potters L.
        • Khuntia D.
        • et al.
        Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 58: 25-33
        • Parsons B.A.
        • Evans S.
        • Wright M.P.
        Prostate cancer and urinary incontinence.
        Maturitas. 2009; 63: 323-328
        • Allen Z.A.
        • Merrick G.S.
        • Butler W.M.
        • et al.
        Detailed urethral dosimetry in the evaluation of prostate brachytherapy-related urinary morbidity.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 62: 981-987
        • Crook J.M.
        • Potters L.
        • Stock R.G.
        • et al.
        Critical organ dosimetry in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy: Defining the organs at risk.
        Brachytherapy. 2005; 4: 186-194
        • McLaughlin P.W.
        • Troyer S.
        • Berri S.
        • et al.
        Functional anatomy of the prostate: Implications for treatment planning.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63: 479-491
        • Merrick G.S.
        • Butler W.M.
        • Wallner K.E.
        • et al.
        The impact of radiation dose to the urethra on brachytherapy-related dysuria.
        Brachytherapy. 2005; 4: 45-50
        • Neill M.
        • Studer G.
        • Le L.
        • et al.
        The nature and extent of urinary morbidity in relation to prostate brachytherapy urethral dosimetry.
        Brachytherapy. 2007; 6: 173-179
        • Pinkawa M.
        • Fischedick K.
        • Piroth M.D.
        • et al.
        Health-related quality of life after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Correlation with postimplant CT scan parameters.
        Strahlenther Onkol. 2006; 182: 660-665
        • Anderson J.F.
        • Swanson D.A.
        • Levy L.B.
        • et al.
        Urinary side effects and complications after permanent prostate brachytherapy: The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience.
        Urology. 2009; 74: 601-605
        • Pardo Y.
        • Guedea F.
        • Aguilo F.
        • et al.
        Quality-of-life impact of primary treatments for localized prostate cancer in patients without hormonal treatment.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 4687-4696
        • Frank S.J.
        • Stafford R.J.
        • Bankson J.A.
        • et al.
        A novel MRI marker for prostate brachytherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71: 5-8
        • Frank S.J.
        • Tailor R.C.
        • Kudchadker R.J.
        • et al.
        Anisotropy characterization of I-125 seed with attached encapsulated cobalt chloride complex contrast agent markers for MRI-based prostate brachytherapy.
        Med Dosim. 2011; 36: 200-205