Brachytherapy
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 20-32, January 2012

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

  • Yoshiya Yamada

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 22, New York, NY 10065. Tel.: +1-212-639-2950; fax: +1-212-639-8876.
  • ,
  • Leland Rogers

      Affiliations

    • Gammawest Brachytherapy, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • D. Jeffrey Demanes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Gerard Morton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
  • ,
  • Bradley R. Prestidge

      Affiliations

    • South Texas Radiation Therapy Associates, Memorial Hermann – Southwest Hospital, Houston, TX
  • ,
  • Jean Pouliot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Gil'ad N. Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Marco Zaider

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Mihai Ghilezan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI
  • ,
  • I-Chow Hsu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

Received 1 April 2011; received in revised form 23 September 2011; accepted 23 September 2011.

Abstract 

Purpose

A well-established body of literature supports the use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Most of the articles describe HDR as a boost with adjuvant external beam radiation, but there is a growing experience with HDR monotherapy.

Methods and Materials

The American Brachytherapy Society has convened a group of expert practitioners and physicists to develop guidelines for the use of HDR in the management of prostate cancer. This involved an extensive literature review and input from an expert panel.

Results

Despite a wide variation in doses and fractionation reported, HDR brachytherapy provides biochemical control rates of 85–100%, 81–100%, and 43–93% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers, respectively. Severe toxicity is rare, with most authors reporting less than 5% Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Careful attention to patient evaluation for appropriate patient selection, meticulous technique, treatment planning, and delivery are essential for successful treatment.

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes for HDR are excellent, with high rates of biochemical control, even for high-risk disease, with low morbidity. HDR monotherapy, both for primary treatment and salvage, are promising treatment modalities.

Keywords: High-dose-rate brachytherapy, Prostate cancer, American Brachytherapy Society, Guidelines

 

 Continuing Medical Education Institute Speakers Bureau.

 No other disclosures for any of the other authors.

PII: S1538-4721(11)00400-4

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2011.09.008

Brachytherapy
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 20-32, January 2012