Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 274-277 (July 2010)


View previous. 22 of 24 View next.

Technical aspects and perspectives of the vaginal mold applicator for brachytherapy of gynecologic malignancies

Nicolas Magné14, Cyrus Chargari124, Nicholas SanFilippo3, Taha Messai1, Alain Gerbaulet1, Christine Haie-Meder1Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 24 March 2009; received in revised form 6 August 2009; accepted 12 August 2009. published online 15 February 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

The importance of the quality of cervical cancer brachytherapy applicators has been reported, suggesting a direct influence of competent technical implant performance on outcome. In our institute, an original brachytherapy technique based on the use of a molded applicator for genital tract brachytherapy has been applied routinely in clinical practice. Here, we report the technical aspects of this customized applicator and perspectives on its use.

Technical Aspects

The first step consists of a vaginal impression that accurately shows the topography and extension of the tumor as well as the anatomy of the vagina and cervix. From this impression, an acrylic applicator is made. Then, the intended positions of the vaginal catheters are drawn on the surface of the mold by the radiation oncologist. Two plastic vaginal catheters are introduced and fixed on the internal surface of the molded applicator. A hole for the cervical os is made through which the uterine probe will be positioned.

Perspectives

This method allows for high specificity within the framework of a modern brachytherapy procedure, integrating the tumor topography, anatomy of the patient, and internal movements of target and critical volumes. This technique has been successfully extended to other tumor locations, such as genital tract rhabdomyosarcoma in children and postoperative endocavitary brachytherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.

Conclusion

Customization of a vaginal brachytherapy applicator allows for the maintenance of morphologic optimization throughout the treatment course, which better takes into account a fourth dimension: internal organ motion during the course of brachytherapy.

1 Department of Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy Service, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France

2 Service of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France

3 Clinical Cancer Center, New York, NY

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy Service, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France. Tel.: +33-142-11-4566; fax: +33-142-11-5208.

4 Both authors have equally contributed to this work.

PII: S1538-4721(09)00365-1

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2009.08.014


View previous. 22 of 24 View next.