Brachytherapy
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 55-60, January 2010

3D CT-based volumetric dose assessment of 2D plans using GEC-ESTRO guidelines for cervical cancer brachytherapy

  • Mingcheng Gao

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maguire Center Room 2944, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. Tel.: +1-708-216-2594; fax: +1-708-216-6076.
  • ,
  • Kevin Albuquerque
  • ,
  • Alex Chi
  • ,
  • Iris Rusu

Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL

Received 6 October 2008; received in revised form 12 May 2009; accepted 15 May 2009. published online 23 October 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

To investigate two-dimensional (2D) radiograph-based plans using three-dimensional (3D) dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters following guidelines from Gynecologic GEC-ESTRO Working Group (GEC-ESTRO).

Methods and Materials

Nineteen high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions from 8 patients were studied. Prescription was 45Gy from external beam radiation therapy plus 30Gy in five fractions from HDR using tandem and ring/ovoids. Both radiographs and CT scan were obtained. Treatment was planned using radiographs following American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines. Retrospective evaluation of above 2D plans on a 3D volumetric basis was achieved by generating CT image-based 3D plans using same dwell times.

Results

In 2D plans, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) bladder and rectal point doses were 3.8±0.4 and 3.0±0.5Gy, respectively. In 3D plans, rectum D2cc is 4.0±1.0Gy and bladder D2cc is 5.4±0.9Gy. Position of actual hottest spot in 3D rectum volume was close to the position of ICRU rectal point. ICRU bladder point did not match with the actual hottest spot in 3D bladder volume. In 2D plans, H-point dose was 5.8±0.2Gy. In 3D plans, dose to CT-based cervix (D90) reduced from 7.1 to 4.2Gy as the cervical volume increased from 12 to 39cc. Average D2cc/ICRU dose ratio was calculated to be 1.36/1.01 for bladder/rectum, respectively.

Conclusions

The DVH analysis of 2D plans revealed a suboptimal coverage of CT-based cervix and a negative correlation between coverage and cervical size. Rectum dose to 2cc weakly correlated with ICRU point dose. Currently published constraint for bladder in 3D planning is tighter than ABS guidelines in past 2D planning.

Keywords: Brachytherapy, Cervical cancer, Three-dimensional treatment planning, CT

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(09)00283-9

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2009.05.004

Brachytherapy
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 55-60, January 2010