Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 8-14 (January 2010)


View previous. 6 of 20 View next.

Relationship between Day 0 dosimetric parameters and biochemical relapse-free survival in patients treated with transperineal permanent prostate interstitial brachytherapy with 125I seeds

Cristina Garrán, Raquel Ciérvide, Mauricio Cambeiro, Marta Moreno-Jiménez, Luis I. Ramos, Rafael Martínez-MongeCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 4 December 2008; received in revised form 3 March 2009; accepted 3 April 2009. published online 21 October 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

To determine the relationship between dosimetric parameters obtained on postimplantation Day 0 and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) in patients treated with 125I transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB).

Methods

Two-hundred twenty men with low-risk (n=155, 70.4%), low-volume intermediate-risk (n=63, 28.7%), or high-risk (n=2, 0.9%) prostate cancer were treated with TIPPB between December 2000 and June 2006. Seventy-four (33.6%) patients received short-term (3–6 months) androgen suppression therapy before TIPPB. The median followup for patients free of biochemical failure was of 37.9 months (range, 24.0–84.5 months).

Results

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis established a best-fit cutoff value for the quantifiers D90 and V100 of 147Gy and 92%, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier analysis of bRFS at the cutoff value of D90=147Gy using the ASTRO, nadir+2, and combined (ASTRO and nadir+2) definitions showed a trend toward statistical significance for the ASTRO (p=0.076) and nadir+2 (p=0.064) definitions and a statistically significant correlation for the combined definition (p=0.033). The corresponding 7-year bRFS for the D90 >147Gy and D90 ≤147Gy subsets using the ASTRO, nadir+2, and combined definitions were 96.5% vs. 89.7% (ASTRO, p=0.076); 93.7% vs. 70.5% (nadir+2, p=0.064); and 94.4 vs. 75.5% (combined, p=0.033). The V100 (%) cutoff value of 92% predicted by the ROC analysis was not significant. Among other cutoff values, only D90=140Gy (p=0.050) and D90=160Gy (p=0.098) showed a trend toward statistical significance when the nadir+2 and the ASTRO definitions were used. The rest of dosimetric, tumor, and patient parameters did not show statistical correlation with bRFS in the Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Conclusions

The cutoff value of D90=147Gy obtained on postimplantation Day 0 showed a trend toward significant correlation with bRFS when the standard ASTRO and nadir+2 definitions were used and a weak but statistically significant correlation with bRFS as per the nonstandard combined definition in a series of patients with predominantly low-risk disease (70.4%) treated at high radiation doses (median D90=152.9Gy, median V100=92.5%).

Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Division, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Navarre, Spain

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarre, Avda Pío XII s/n, Pamplona, Navarre E-31080, Spain. Tel.: +34-948-255400; fax: +34-948-255500.

 The authors declare no conflict of interest.

PII: S1538-4721(09)00268-2

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2009.04.005


View previous. 6 of 20 View next.