Journal Home
Search for

Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (January 2010)


View previous. 5 of 20 View next.

Rectal morbidity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer—Impact of Day 1 vs. Day 30 computed tomography–based postimplant dosimetry

Michael Pinkawa1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Marc D. Piroth1, Richard Holy1, Jens Klotz1, Sandra Nussen1, Holger Borchers2, Axel Heidenreich2, Michael J. Eble1

Received 16 March 2009; received in revised form 24 April 2009; accepted 28 April 2009. published online 04 September 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate bowel quality-of-life changes after prostate brachytherapy and the impact of Day 1 vs. Day 30 postimplant dosimetry.

Methods and Materials

In 61 patients, computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at Days 1 and 30 after 125I brachytherapy. The patients have been surveyed prospectively before (time A), 1 month (time B), and >1 year after treatment (time C) using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Different parameters were tested for their predictive value on bowel quality-of-life changes (bowel bother score decrease >20 points at time B=BB20; bowel bother score decrease >10 points at time C=BC10), including seed displacements.

Results

Mean bowel function/bother score decreased 13/13 points at time B (p<0.01) and 1/4 points at time C (change not significant). BB20 and BC10 were found in 25% and 20% of patients, respectively. Bowel bother score declines at time B correlated well with declines at time C (r=0.53; p<0.01). Prostate volume before implantation and the number of seeds per cubic centimeters were found to be predictive for BB20 and BC10. Smaller rectal wall volumes covered by the 60–100% isodoses at Day 1 were (paradoxically) found to be significantly predictive for BC10. Larger posterior seed displacements between Days 1 and 30 were significantly associated with BB20.

Conclusions

Quality-of-life scores have not been found to change significantly >1 year after brachytherapy. Larger rectal wall volumes within higher isodoses at Day 1 or 30 were not found to be predisposing for adverse quality-of-life changes.

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

2 Department of Urology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany. Tel.: +49-241-80-35314; fax: +49-241-80-82543.

PII: S1538-4721(09)00266-9

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2009.04.003


View previous. 5 of 20 View next.