Brachytherapy
Volume 8, Issue 3 , Pages 284-289, July 2009

Interstitial brachytherapy in the management of persistent head and neck disease after definitive external beam radiation therapy

  • Laval Grimard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8L6. Tel.: +1-613-737-7700 ext. 70194; fax: +1-613-247-3511.
  • ,
  • Bernd Esche

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • André Lamothe

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Johanna N. Spaans

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Received 30 March 2008; received in revised form 29 December 2008; accepted 30 December 2008. published online 18 May 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

Persistent disease after definitive external beam radiation therapy for head and neck (H&N) malignancies negatively impacts survival. In this series, the effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of persistent H&N disease is explored.

Methods

All patients who received brachytherapy for persistent H&N disease between 1987 and 2002 were identified. Tumor and treatment characteristics and toxicities were recorded. Progression-free survival and overall survival estimates were generated. The influence of prognostic factors was determined.

Results

Twelve patients were analyzable. Brachytherapy was given curatively (n=4) in patients not amenable to surgery or in combination with surgical dissection to avoid carotid resection (n=8). Seven patients had disease progression with a median time to progression of 11 months (95% confidence interval: 0–22.9). The only negative prognostic factor was time to re-treatment (brachytherapy >4 months) after definitive treatment (p=0.003). Overall survival at 1 and 5 years was 50% and 21%, respectively. Toxicity was limited to one major complication (fistula) and five minor toxicities: low-grade radionecrosis (n=2), cellulitis (n=1), and wound dehiscence (n=2).

Conclusion

In patients with persistent disease, brachytherapy is an appealing re-treatment alternative. When combined with neck dissection, brachytherapy yields less morbidity than the surgical alternative of carotid resection.

Keywords: Brachytherapy, Head and neck, Cancer, Persistent

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 None of the authors have a financial interest, arrangement, or affiliation with a commercial organization that may have a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this article.

PII: S1538-4721(09)00195-0

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2008.12.007

Brachytherapy
Volume 8, Issue 3 , Pages 284-289, July 2009