Brachytherapy
Volume 8, Issue 3 , Pages 309-312, July 2009

Prostate brachytherapy seed embolization to the right renal artery

  • Ba D. Nguyen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA. Tel.: +1-480-301-4707; fax: +1-480-301-4303.
  • ,
  • Steven E. Schild

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • ,
  • William W. Wong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • ,
  • Sujay A. Vora

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ

Received 3 September 2008; received in revised form 16 November 2008; accepted 18 November 2008. published online 13 February 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

We report three cases of seed embolization to the right renal artery after iodine-125 (I-125) transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Methods and materials

Case 1: A 65-year-old man presented with right flank and back pain less than 4 months after prostatic seed implantation. CT evaluation for renal stone showed a seed embedded in the lower aspect of the right kidney. Case 2: A 73-year-old man complained of painless hematuria 3 years after prostatic seed brachytherapy. CT and subsequent abdominal angiography showed a seed embolization to a lower branch of the right renal artery. Case 3: An 84-year-old man presented with gross hematuria 7 months after prostatic seed implantation. Excretory urogram and subsequent CT demonstrated the right lower renal seed migration.

Results

Prostatic seed embolization to the right renal artery may cause pain and hematuria. This pattern of seed migration may be easily overlooked by imagers because it mimics renal lithiasis on cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of prior history of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy and careful radiologic interpretation may help to achieve the correct diagnosis of rare renal seed migration.

Conclusions

We present an additional atypical site of brachytherapy seed relocation in the right renal artery in 3 patients. This type of migration is probably secondary to pulmonary arteriovenous malformation or right-to-left cardiac shunts. Awareness of the propensity of seeds to dislodge and vigilance in imaging interpretation of prostatic brachytherapy recipients are necessary for the correct diagnosis of seed embolization.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Iodine-125 seed, Embolization, Kidney

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(08)00683-1

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2008.11.011

Brachytherapy
Volume 8, Issue 3 , Pages 309-312, July 2009