Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 4 , Pages 305-309, October 2008

Incidence and prognostic factors for seroma development after MammoSite breast brachytherapy

  • John M. Watkins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Harper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Anthony E. Dragun

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Michael S. Ashenafi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Debajyoti Sinha

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Biometrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Jun Li

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • David J. Cole

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Joseph M. Jenrette III

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425. Tel.: +1-843-792-3271; fax: +1-843-792-5498.

Received 25 July 2007; received in revised form 29 May 2008; accepted 21 July 2008. published online 09 September 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

Describe the incidence and identify risk factors for seroma development after MammoSite breast brachytherapy (MBT).

Methods and Materials

MBT patient data were prospectively recorded into a quality assurance database. Departmental and electronic records were reviewed to extract patient-, treatment-, and outcome-specific data. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with development of any seroma including the subset of clinically significant seroma (CSS). CSS was defined as a symptomatic seroma requiring multiple aspirations, biopsy, and/or excision. Variables analyzed included age, weight, number of excisions, time from resection to catheter placement, placement technique, balloon volume, dosimetric factors, and postbrachytherapy infection.

Results

MBT was performed in 109 patients, of whom 97 had minimum 6 months (median, 36) post-MBT follow-up or earlier development of seroma. All patients received 34Gy to 1cm depth from balloon surface, delivered twice daily in 10 fractions. Seroma developed in 41% of patients at a median of 3 months (range, 0.1–25) post-MBT. One-third of seromas (13% of all patients) were CSS. The only factor identified as statistically significant for development of any seroma was catheter placement on day of resection vs. ≥1 day later (59% vs. 33%; p=0.0066). Post-MBT infection was highly statistically significant for development of CSS (64% vs. 7%; p<0.0001). Prophylactic antibiotics reduced the risk of post-MBT infection from 37.5% to 6% (p=0.011).

Conclusions

The incidence of CSS after MBT is low. Post-MBT infection is statistically significantly associated with CSS development, the incidence of which is reduced with prophylactic antibiotics.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms, Intracavitary brachytherapy, MammoSite, Seroma, Breast conservation therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest notification: No actual or potential conflicts of interest exist for the contributors to this manuscript.

 Conflicts of interest: Watkins (None), Harper (none), Dragun (none), Li (none), Ashenafi (none), Sinha (none), Cole (none), Jenrette (none).

PII: S1538-4721(08)00597-7

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2008.07.001

Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 4 , Pages 305-309, October 2008