« Previous
Next »
Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 3
, Pages 217-222
, July 2008
Distant and local recurrence in patients with biochemical failure after prostate brachytherapy
References
- Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen velocity after radical prostatectomy to distinguish local recurrence from distant metastases. Urology. 1994;43:649–659
- . Linear regressive analysis using prostate-specific antigen doubling time for predicting tumor biology and clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer. 1993;72:2638–2643
- . Prostate specific antigen doubling time and disease relapse after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Cancer. 1994;74:670–678
- Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer; recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:965–974
- . AJCC 1992 staging system. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997;
- A modified technique allowing interactive ultrasound-guided three-dimensional transperineal prostate implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:219–225
- . Prostate brachytherapy: Treatment strategies. J Urol. 1999;162:421–426
- . Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:444–452
- Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:1352–1359
- Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: Effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:527–533
- . Histopathological changes induced by therapies in the benign prostate and prostate adenocarcinoma. Histol Histopathol. 2007;1:107–118
- The effect of disease and treatment-related factors on biopsy results after prostate brachytherapy: Implications for treatment optimization. Cancer. 2000;89:1829–1834
- . SPSS 10.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000;
- Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: Analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:677–685
- Consensus statements on radiation therapy of prostate cancer: Guidelines for prostate re-biopsy after radiation and for radiation therapy with rising prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1155–1163
- A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:101–108
- A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:605–614
- 125I versus 103Pd for low-risk prostate cancer: Preliminary PSA outcomes from a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1297–1303
- Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:327–333
- High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;166:876–881
- Beneficial effect of combination hormonal therapy administered prior and following external beam radiation therapy in localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:247–252
- . Changing the patterns of failure for high-risk prostate cancer patients by optimizing local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:389–394
- Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–1597
- Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol. 2004;172:42–46
Conflict of interest statement: The following authors have relationships that might be considered as potential conflicts of interest: Jamie A. Cesaretti—consultant BARD urologic; Nelson N. Stone—ownership Prologics, LLC.
PII: S1538-4721(08)00559-X
doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.04.002
© 2008 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 3
, Pages 217-222
, July 2008
