Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 217-222, July 2008

Distant and local recurrence in patients with biochemical failure after prostate brachytherapy

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Pathology, and Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Received 31 January 2008; received in revised form 28 March 2008; accepted 29 April 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

To analyze the patterns of failure after the brachytherapy management of localized prostate cancer.

Methods and materials

From 1990 to 2008, 2869 patients underwent prostate brachytherapy and 213 experienced a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure by the Phoenix definition. Of these 213 patients, 33.5% were low, 18.5% intermediate, and 58% high risk.

Results

Of the 119 patients biopsied, 36 (30%) had a least one positive posttreatment biopsy. In univariate and multivariate analyses, PSA doubling time was the most predictive of a positive biopsy. Patients with doubling times ≤3, >3–6, ≥6–10, and >10 months had positive biopsy rates of 9%, 18%, 36%, and 42%, respectively (p=0.01). The actuarial rate of remaining free from distant metastases at 10 years was 73%. Patients with PSA doubling times of ≤3, >3–6, >6–10, and >10 months had freedom from distant metastases rates of 0%, 74%, 78%, and 94.5% at 10 years, respectively (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, PSA doubling time and time to PSA failure were the most significant predictors of developing distant metastases.

Conclusions

About one third of patients harbor a component of local failure and one fourth demonstrate clinical metastases. PSA doubling time can be used to help predict the source of a rising PSA.

Keywords: Patterns of failure, Prostate brachytherapy, Prostate cancer, PSA doubling time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest statement: The following authors have relationships that might be considered as potential conflicts of interest: Jamie A. Cesaretti—consultant BARD urologic; Nelson N. Stone—ownership Prologics, LLC.

PII: S1538-4721(08)00559-X

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2008.04.002

Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 217-222, July 2008