Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 43-46, January 2008

Systemic iodine 125 activity after GliaSite brachytherapy: Safety considerations

  • Jarrod B. Adkison

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
  • ,
  • Bruce Thomadsen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
    • Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
  • ,
  • Steven P. Howard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, K4/350 CSC, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. Tel.: +1-608-263-9961; fax: +1-608-263-9167.

Received 2 August 2007; received in revised form 5 November 2007; accepted 19 November 2007. published online 18 January 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

After contaminated radioactive linens were detected on the completion of intracranial brachytherapy for a patient episodically incontinent of urine, the systemic absorption of iodine 125 from the GliaSite Radiation Therapy System was studied. Diffusion and leakage of 125I through the walls of the GliaSite balloon catheter have previously been reported to be negligible in both animal and human studies examining the radioactivity of urine during and after treatment. Our study estimated total systemic absorption based on activity defect measurements rather than using urinary excretion as a surrogate.

Methods and materials

Six patients treated with complete data were reviewed. The activity at the time of injection was compared to the activity recovered on completion of treatment after adjustment for decay.

Results

By comparing the activity of 125I infused with the activity recovered, 0.5–5.5% of infused 125I remained unaccounted after adjusting for decay over the 4-day treatment period. The patient with contaminated hospital linens due to urinary incontinence had unaccounted activity of 2.3%. Comparisons of the volume of liquid 125I and saline removed on completion to treatment to the volume originally instilled revealed no difference using hand-held syringes.

Conclusions

The systemic absorption of 125I is much greater than previously appreciated with potential clinical sequelae and safety concerns. GliaSite should be used with caution in patients incontinent of urine, and a Foley catheter should be placed to collect contaminated urine for incontinent patients.

Keywords: GliaSite, Iotrex, Brachytherapy, Contamination, Incontinence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(07)00277-2

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2007.11.001

Brachytherapy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 43-46, January 2008