Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 280-285, October 2007

Rectum dose reduction and individual treatment plan optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

  • Tobias Bölling

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str.33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. Tel.: +49-251-83-47384; fax: +49-251-83-47355.
  • ,
  • Christos Moustakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Hassan Elsayed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan-Bodo Müller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Christoph Weining

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Gabriele Reinartz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Iris Ernst

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Normann Willich

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan Könemann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Münster, Germany

Received 24 March 2007; received in revised form 11 June 2007; accepted 29 June 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

Different doses and techniques used in high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy make it difficult to define universal quality parameters. The aim of this study was to develop individual, objective parameters for the evaluation of an HDR brachytherapy plan for prostate radiation.

Methods

Fifty-three patients who received an HDR brachytherapy boost after external radiation were analyzed in this study. Brachytherapy was performed with a 192Ir source after ultrasound-guided, transperineal metal needle application followed by removal of the ultrasound probe to reduce organ dose levels at the anterior rectum wall. The rectum and prostate locations as well as the dose at the anterior rectum wall were estimated under the anatomical conditions of HDR prostate brachytherapy. The doses at the organs at risk (rectum and urethra) were analyzed for several parameters, which were compared to values of former patients before the start of treatment. In cases of major deviations, modifications of the treatment plan were performed before starting the treatment.

Results

Deflating of the water balloon led to an increase of the space between the anterior rectal wall and the dorsal margin of the prostate (mean, 6mm; 1–10mm). The dose of the introduced “virtual rectum,” represented by the ventral surface of the ultrasound probe, in the treatment plan correlated to dose measurements in the rectum. Pretreatment evaluation and comparison of the established individual quality parameters led in two cases to a treatment plan modification.

Conclusions

This method allows a fast and objective individual brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation and improvement.

Keywords: High-dose-rate brachytherapy, Prostate, Treatment plan optimization, Rectum position

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(07)00248-6

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2007.06.001

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 280-285, October 2007