Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 258-266, October 2007

The impact of acute urinary morbidity on late urinary function after permanent prostate brachytherapy

  • Nathan Bittner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Gregory S. Merrick

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. The Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, 1 Medical Park, Wheeling, WV 26003. Tel.: +1-304-243-3490; fax: +1-304-243-5047.
  • ,
  • Kent E. Wallner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Radiation Oncology, Puget Sound Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Jonathan H. Lief

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
  • ,
  • Wayne M. Butler

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
  • ,
  • Robert W. Galbreath

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV

Received 7 May 2007; received in revised form 15 August 2007; accepted 24 August 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

Acute prostate brachytherapy-related morbidity is dominated by urinary symptomatology. In this study, we evaluated the effect of severe early brachytherapy-related urinary morbidity on late urinary function.

Methods and materials

From January 1998 to September 2003, 1029 patients were implanted for clinical stage T1b–T3a (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] criteria) prostate cancer. Five hundred sixteen (50.1%) received supplemental external beam radiation therapy and 440 (42.8%) received androgen deprivation therapy. Severe acute urinary morbidity (SAUM) was defined as a dysuria frequency score of at least 4 (of 5), a dysuria severity score of at least 8 (of 10), an internation prostate symptom score (IPSS) elevated to at least 30 or 15 above preimplant value for 4 weeks, and/or requirement of a urinary catheter for at least 5 days. Dysuria severity and frequency resolution were defined as a return to within one point of baseline. IPSS resolution was defined as a return to within two points of baseline.

Results

Of the 1029 patients, 175 met at least one of the criteria for inclusion. Dysuria frequency resolved in 5.0 vs. 1.3 weeks and dysuria severity in 5.7 vs. 1.4 weeks, for patients with and without SAUM. The mean time for IPSS resolution was 13.8 vs. 6.6 weeks, for patients with and without SAUM. The incidence of transurethral resection (2.3% [4/173] vs. 1.5% [13/841]) and bulbomembranous urethral strictures (2.2% [4/175] vs. 1.8% [15/854]) were comparable among patients with and without SAUM.

Conclusions

Patients experiencing brachytherapy-related SAUM have long-term urinary function and complications comparable to patients who did not develop SAUM.

Keywords: Prostate, Brachytherapy, Urinary morbidity, Dysuria

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(07)00247-4

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2007.08.008

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 258-266, October 2007