Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 212-217, July 2007

Brachytherapy boost: A novel approach for epiglottic carcinoma

  • Rajendra L. Bhalavat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, MS 400 012, India. Tel.: +91-22-2417-7152; fax: +91-22-2414-6937.
  • ,
  • Kumar Alok Pathak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
  • ,
  • Umesh Mahantshetty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India
  • ,
  • Swamidas V. Jamema

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India

Received 26 July 2006; received in revised form 13 November 2006; accepted 18 December 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

Epiglottic (epilaryngeal) carcinoma has been treated conventionally by radical external beam radiotherapy or partial laryngectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of brachytherapy boost as a novel approach for lingual epiglottic lesions.

Methods and materials

Twenty-three patients with T2–3N0–1 lingual epiglottic carcinoma (SCC) were treated with curative intent between January 1990 and December 2001 using low dose rate interstitial 192Ir implant boost, moderate dose of 25Gy at 0.5cm (mean dose rate, 50.5cGy/h) 3 weeks after moderate dose of external beam radiotherapy (mEBRT) of 46Gy/23#/28–31d.

Results

Complete response after mEBRT was observed in 18 of the 23 patients (78%) and partial response was seen in 5 of the 23 patients (22%). After implant, all patients had complete response. Locoregional control was seen in 19 of the 23 patients (82.6%). Two patients developed distant metastases. Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years were 68.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Disease-free survival at 5 years showed a trend toward better outcome for biologically equivalent doses >85Gy compared with biologically equivalent doses <85Gy (80% vs. 68%) (p=0.18). All patients had minimal to acceptable xerostomia.

Conclusions

Interstitial boost with mEBRT is feasible, effective, and a novel approach for lingual epiglottic lesions.

Keywords: Epiglottic cancer, Supraglottic cancer, Interstitial radiation, Implant, Brachytherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and have no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1538-4721(07)00211-5

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2006.12.002

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 212-217, July 2007