Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 53-57, January 2007

Adjuvant high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiation in soft tissue sarcoma: A comparison of outcomes

  • Surjeet Pohar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 600 Gresham Drive, Norfolk, VA 23507. Tel.: +1-757-388-2075; fax: +1-757-627-0334.
  • ,
  • Rashid Haq

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Lizhong Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Michael Koniarczyk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Seung Hahn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Timothy Damron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
  • ,
  • Jesse N. Aronowitz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA

Received 25 September 2006; received in revised form 1 November 2006; accepted 3 November 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

To compare outcomes of patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) adjuvant brachytherapy (BT)+external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs. high-dose-rate (HDR) adjuvant BT+EBRT.

Methods and materials

Thirty-seven patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) were treated with pre- or postoperative external beam irradiation and postoperative LDR or HDR BT.

Results

There was no significant difference in the 2-year local control rates (90% with LDR boost vs. 94% for HDR). The rate of National Cancer Institute (NCI) grades 2–4 wound-healing complications was 40% in the LDR group vs. 18% in the HDR group (p=0.14). On univariate analysis, only suboptimal geometry of the implant predicted for increasing complication rate in the LDR group. In the HDR group, BT dose per fraction, total BT dose, and total biologically equivalent dose (BED3) radiation dose were significant.

Conclusions

HDR and LDR boost BT results in acceptable local control for STS. There is a suggestion that HDR may have lower incidence of severe (grade ≥3) acute toxicity than LDR.

Keywords: HDR, Brachytherapy, Sarcoma, Radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 47th ASTRO Annual Meeting, October 2005, Denver, CO.

PII: S1538-4721(06)00301-1

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2006.11.004

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 53-57, January 2007