Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 38-43, January 2007

Is seminal vesicle implantation with permanent sources possible? A dose–volume histogram analysis in patients undergoing combined 103Pd implantation and external beam radiation for T3c prostate cancer

  • Alice Y. Ho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Ryan J. Burri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Glenn T. Jennings

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Nelson N. Stone

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Jamie A. Cesaretti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Richard G. Stock

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Box 1236, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029-6574. Tel.: +1-212-241-7502; fax: +1-212-410-7194.

Received 12 December 2005; received in revised form 27 September 2006; accepted 28 September 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) is evolving as a successful treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the SV was performed in patients with biopsy-positive SV who received implantation of the SV and prostate.

Methods and materials

Fifteen consecutive patients with high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10ng/mL, Gleason score ≥7, or clinical stage ≥T2b) and a positive SV biopsy were treated with a 103Pd implant of the prostate and SV followed by 45Gy of EBRT. DVHs were generated for the prostate and total SV volume (SVT). In addition, the SV was divided into 3-mm-thick volumes identified as SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 starting from the junction of the prostate and SV and extending distally. Delivered dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the organ on DVH).

Results

The median number of seeds implanted into the prostate and the SVT was 59 (41–94) and 9 (4–21), respectively. The median D90 values for the prostate, SVT, SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 were 103.2 (87.4–137.1), 46.2 (4.0–69.4), 76.0 (31.2–147), 63.4 (25.1–145.9), 49.7 (15.3–118), 27.4 (9.3–135.1), 14.2 (2.3–100.3), and 3.9 (0–61.5) Gy, respectively.

Conclusions

Implantation of the SV using a real-time intraoperative approach is technically feasible and results in higher doses to the SV than has been reported with implantation of the prostate alone. Although dose distribution in the SV can be variable and unpredictable, these doses, in combination with 45Gy of EBRT, may be adequate to control disease spread in these organs.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Seminal vesicles, Dose–volume histogram, D90

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1538-4721(06)00298-4

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2006.09.003

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 38-43, January 2007