Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 58-61, January 2007

Severe toxicity after permanent radioactive seed implantation for mediastinal carcinoid tumors

  • Alexandra J. Stewart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44-(0)-208-642-6011; fax: +44-(0)-208-661-3470.
  • ,
  • Desmond A. O'Farrell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Subhakar Mutyala

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
  • ,
  • Raphael Bueno

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • David J. Sugarbaker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Robert A. Cormack

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Phillip M. Devlin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Received 26 June 2006; received in revised form 29 August 2006; accepted 30 August 2006. published online 11 December 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

Permanent implantation of 125I seeds may be used when uninvolved surgical margins are unobtainable or close. Two cases of mediastinal carcinoid tumors with prior chemoradiation had tumors adherent to esophageal muscularis. Both underwent intraoperative permanent seed implantation and developed esophageal fistulas requiring surgical correction.

Methods and materials

Custom permanent 125I seed mesh implants were fashioned intraoperatively in a geometrically coherent pattern. The implants were directly sutured to the partially resected esophageal wall. The postimplant CT scans were fused with the postfistula scans to provide dosimetric information at the fistula site. Doses were calculated from time of insertion to time of fistula formation. Neither patient showed evidence of disease recurrence at the time of fistula repair.

Results

Patient 1 developed an esophageal-pleural fistula 83 days after seed implantation. Patient 2 developed a broncho-pleural fistula 300 days after seed implantation.

Conclusions

These cases demonstrated that implantation in the setting of extensive subcarinal space dissection and partial esophageal wall resection could cause fistula formation and the need for additional surgery. The high mucosal dose, despite the relatively low activity implant, was due to lack of geometric sparing of the mucosa. We recommend that extensive subcarinal space dissection be considered a contraindication to permanent seed implantation.

Keywords: Fistula formation, Interstitial brachytherapy, Seed implant, Mediastinal carcinoid

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 All research was conducted at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

PII: S1538-4721(06)00249-2

doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2006.08.009

Brachytherapy
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 58-61, January 2007